I would advocate its utility for the purpose of daycare for the working poor and for neglected or abandoned children, provided it operated strictly on local authority. My interactions with public school teachers have convinced me that this is the only purpose they can honestly justify, as this is primarily what they are doing already.

My interactions with college instructors have convinced me that there is no justification for the claims of academic excellence in public schools; high achievement is always due to extraordinary initiative on the part of an individual teacher, the student, or the parents.

The socialization argument is plainly ridiculous, yet it is extremely common. Its prevalence is a sign of the widespread despair about the persistent failures in public schooling, a tacit admission that “education” in the public system is a waste of time.

That being said, I love going to the bookstore or a library. Nothing beats just being able to randomly peruse through dozens of books.

Because my parents homeschooled me I was never subjected to peer pressure, never caught up having to be “cool”, hardly ever got sick, and I ended up being reasonably more intelligent then most of my co-workers. Seriously, I had to explain the difference between Sadism and Satanism to a woman who had 10 years and six kids on me.

I’m also dyslexic. If I had been in public school I would have been held back and doped up.

There is no excuse that validates public schools. They’re a bad idea and need to be shut down. The last people that should be responsible for educating and taking care of our children are the government.

Plus, I hate school buses sooooooo much. Yellow monsters we called them when I was growing up. All they did was eat up kids and then spit them out.

The End of Darwinism
by Eugene G. Windchy
http://theendofdarwinism.com/

A series of famous biologists have appeared to support Darwin’s explanation for biological change while not actually believing in it. Even Thomas Huxley. “Darwin’s bulldog,” privately rejected Darwin’s principles of gradual transformation and survival of the fittest. But Huxley needed the money he could make writing on a controversial topic, and he had a grudge against the church. Huxley boasted that, against the church, evolution was his “Whitworth gun,” an advanced firearm of the time.

Soren Lovtrup called Darwinism a “deceit.” It is much more than that. It is the most enduring hoax in the history of science, a rigid mindset, immune to reason and reality, initiated, promoted and perpetuated by six generations of congenital atheists, not one of whom ever contributed a scintilla to the only aspect of phylogeny that has ever been in question – the mechanism by which it took (past tense)place. There is not a single word in Darwin’s opus minimus that has anything whatsoever to do with its title – not a word!

http://www.jadavison.wordpress.com

There are very few left in this country that think doctrine matters. Tolerance and inclusiveness are the current games, so just ignore your Bible and form an alliance with whoever.