Unsustainable Injustice

Right now my paid work has me awash in “sustainability” rhetoric. The abundance of this term makes me think about its origins in a scarcity outlook–the notion that humans are sucking up all the natural resources, leaving the planet used up, dried out, and dead. The world is said to be made up of a fragile network of interdependent systems verging on collapse, everything struggling hopelessly against the merciless tormentors. It just can’t survive, it can’t adapt, it can’t evolve. For millennia it was perfectly balanced, but the godlike humans are just too powerful now. I’m afraid this bears no resemblance to the real world, though.

Then there’s all the “green” stuff:  green community, green culture, green ethics. The abuse heaped on the green movement really is not undeserved. Greening includes explicit paganism in a pantheistic framework, such as equinox rituals, moon veneration, and attributing spiritual powers to animals and trees. I don’t subscribe to the superstitious paranoia that assigns deep chthonic powers to someone’s absurd ideas, though. What is more interesting to me is why they choose this route;  it is undeniably a religious impulse, despite all the phony gestures of scientific rationalization.

“Social justice” is also a big part of their vocabulary. Whereas some use it as an updated term for “charity,” others see it as a revolutionary ideology. See the Social Justice Education Project in Arizona, which favors a ridiculous pseudo-maoist film studies logo and a lot of self-righteous, racist pablum aimed at high school students. There’s a big difference between being an alien worker who deserves just treatment from legal citizens, and being  an expatriate mercenary soldier determined to overthrow a sovereign government. I’m glad I don’t live in California anymore.

Again, I don’t attribute magical powers to the names people choose. The more important issue is the motivation for choosing a particular identity.


4 thoughts on “Unsustainable Injustice

  1. The concern about Green ethics is that people are made to feel guilty about that which is not sin, and worse, people can feel proud about doing what is considered right from a green perspective, such that real sin may be downplayed or ignored.

  2. Probably, though a guess there is a grade in cultures from inadequate moral commands, to distorted moral commands, to identification of amoral behaviour with immorality.

    The existence of green ethics also reveals the religious nature of the movement.

  3. Yes, I was surprised by how open they are about it, especially with each other.

    Also, it seems that some of the scientists encourage the religious aspect, with the excuse that it is necessary in order to obtain behavioral changes. Certainly the educators and social workers promote the religious view for this reason. Unfortunately, I’m going to be immersed in this drivel for the next month.

Instigate some pointless rambling

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s